Home · Our Principles · Our Constitution · Our Officers · News · Articles · YipBlogs · Discussion Forum · Web Resources · Site Archives · Search · RSS FeedWednesday, September 08, 2010
Navigation
Home
News
Articles
YipBlogs
Discussion Forum
Local Contacts
Web Resources
Site Archives
Join YPSL
Search
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest Articles
Peter Schiff on CNBC-Live
Crisis in the Caucasus
Review of "Revolution in the Air" by Max Elbaum
Review of "Kronstadt 1917-1921" by Israel Getzler
Review of Jack London's "The Iron Heel"
Review of "The Conscience of the Revolution" by Robert Daniels
"The Conscience of the Revolution" is Robert Daniels's thorough history of the internal debates and struggles within the Bolshevik (later Communist) Party, from its 1903 establishment under Lenin until the late 1920s, when "the last voices of real opposition were stifled by Stalin" (vii). It focuses especially on two periods: the controversies and crises of the Civil War period (such as the Nationality Question, the Trade-Union Controversy, and the 10th Party Congress of 1921) and opposition (by Trotsky, Zinoviev, Bukharin, and others) to the developing Stalinist dictatorship following the death of Lenin. Of course, other issues, such as debates over whether, when and how to seize power in 1917, are also discussed. The final chapter on "Why the Opposition Failed" is especially impressive, synthesizing objective factors such as the Civil War and Russia's relative backwardness with the personal failings of opposition leaders such as Trotsky.

I read "The Conscience of the Revolution" some years ago and I remember being impressed by the wealth of detail on many conflicts and disagreements among Russian Communists. Though the writing is somewhat dry and academic (the book actually got its start as Daniels's 1950 Harvard Ph.D. dissertation), it is clearly written and very well-organized, and anyone with an interest in the subject will find it engrossing and far from tedious. Everything is extensively documented, with over 100 pages of appendices, notes, bibliography and index. I was pleased to find that the appendices include early examples of two-dimensional graphical political analyses of the type recently popularized by the "Political Compass" (politicalcompass.org), which plot actors' programs ("mass-interest" vs. "class-interest") on the horizontal axis and methods ("hard" vs. "soft") on the vertical.

Though I imagine some might be inclined to sneer at "The Conscience of the Revolution" as a study of petty factionalism and sectarianism on the left, Daniels argues eloquently that studying the Communist opposition sheds light into both why Stalinism emerged from the October Revolution and that there were other alternatives, even after the Bolsheviks had established their single-party "dictatorship of the proletariat". He describes the basic conflict as that between "Leninist" and "Leftist" communism, the first devoted to power ("revolutionary pragmatism") and the other to principle ("revolutionary idealism") (4). The tension between these two wings "was resolved in the victory of the Leninist current of Communism over the Leftist, the triumph of reality over program" (5). Daniels's goal is to explain this struggle and its results, as well as to rescue the idealists from the obscurity into which they were cast by the triumph of Stalin's will.

My only objection to Daniels's work is its exclusive focus on opposition from within the Communist Party. For instance, the Kronstadt Revolt of 1921, despite being "the most serious internal political crisis ever faced by the Soviet government" (143), receives a scant three pages. I would have appreciated more information on left-wing opposition outside the party, among anarchists, Mensheviks, left SRs and others, especially in the period before the Bolshevik dictatorship had been consolidated and all external opposition suppressed. But since Daniels's focus is on tensions within Bolshevism itself, the omission of this topic is reasonable, and doesn't significantly detract from a classic study.

Contents:
1. The Formation of the Bolshevik Party
2. The Bolshevik Factions in the Revolution of 1917
3. The Brest-Litovsk Controversy and the Left Communists
4. War Communism and the Centralization Controversies
5. The Trade-Union Controversy
6. The Crisis of 1921
7. Leninism Restored
8. The Interregnum
9. The New Course Controversy
10. The Party after Lenin
11. The Zinoviev Opposition
12. The United Opposition
13. The Right Opposition
14. "Enemies of the People"
15. Why the Opposition Failed
Comments
No Comments have been Posted.
Post Comment
Please Login to Post a Comment.
Ratings
Rating is available to Members only.

Please login or register to vote.

No Ratings have been Posted.
Member Poll
What do you think of Chavez's Fifth International?

It's the best thing since sliced bread!

It has potential, but I'm reserving judgment.

Shouldn't this be, like, the Seventh or Eighth International?

It's doomed. Doomed, I say!

What? Never heard of it.

You must login to vote.
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

daschaich
12/12/2009 00:20
@ComSoc91: I do, so do others.

UptheIrons666
12/04/2009 05:34
People are just absolutely unbelievable.

ComSoc91
10/23/2009 19:15
who has admin priveleges?

dontfeedmrsa
09/17/2009 17:28
I think...I might cut down on the coffee...

machinedog
08/31/2009 19:07
@SocRed15 Rebuilding offers plenty of room for recorruption. Cleaning out house the house would be plenty easier.

Shoutbox Archive
The Forum
Latest Posts
Going into receivership
Posted By: daschaich
On: 02/01/2010 05:10
Playing with site fe...
Posted By: daschaich
On: 01/25/2010 01:17
2010 Z Media Institute
Posted By: daschaich
On: 01/24/2010 19:04
National Day of Acti...
Posted By: daschaich
On: 01/18/2010 02:21
Indiana Socialists
Posted By: redguard7
On: 01/12/2010 16:53
Copyright ©2003-2010 The Young People's Socialist League